Immanuel
Kant
1724–1804
Idealism
They
never lived at the same time, but history always put Locke and Kant on a dust
up. A famed German thinker, Kant (1724–1804) was an advocate of public education
and of learning by doing, a process we call training. As he reasons that these
are two vastly different things. He postulated “Above all things, obedience is
an essential feature in the character of a child…”. As opposed to Locke, he
surmises that children should always obey and learn the virtue of duty, because
children’s inclination to earn or do something is something unreliable. And
transgressions should always be dealt with punishment, thus enforcing
obedience. Also, he theorized that man, naturally, has a radical evil in their
nature. And learning and duty can erase this.
I agree to the statement that children should follow the rules being obedience they will learn something. Every learning we have their is also equivalent of punishment.
TumugonBurahini somehow agree to Kant's words that behavior can be learned through conditioning using punishment, but it is not always effective to everyone, Some may reveal their dark side when punished.
TumugonBurahin