Miyerkules, Hulyo 10, 2013

William Kilpatrick
1871-1965
Progressivism

Kilpatrick taught the project method, where the interest of the child should be at the center of the project. Purposeful learning becomes the motivation. He was influenced by John Dewey.



John Dewey
1859-1952
Pragmatism

Dewey, in My Pedagogic Creed wrote

“I believe that:
• All education proceeds by the participation of the individual in the social consciousness of the race.
• The only true education comes through the stimulation of the child's powers by the demands of the social situations in which he finds himself.
• This educational process has two sides - one psychological and one sociological; and that neither can be subordinated to the other or neglected without evil results following. Of these two sides, the psychological is the basis. The child's own instincts and powers furnish the material and give the starting point for all education.
• The psychological and social sides are organically related and that education cannot be regarded as a compromise between the two, or a superimposition of one upon the other.
• The teacher is not in the school to impose certain ideas or to form certain habits in the child, but is there as a member of the community to select the influences which shall affect the child and to assist him in properly responding to these influences.
• The teacher is engaged, not simply in the training of individuals, but in the formation of the proper social life.”

Adapted from School Journal vol. 54 (January 1897), pp. 77-80
http://www.applestar.org/capella/Educational%20Philosophers.pdf

Karl Marx
1818-1883
Marxism

Marx speaks oft the exploitation of one class by another. He also discusses the economic disparities between the classes. Education perpetuates the inequities between classes and continues with the status quo. Political change occurs when the exploited class revolts against the controlling class. He recommended that the government take over the role of the ruling class to create equity between the classes. He believed  education could change society..

Freidrich Froebel
1782-1852

Froebel's philosophy of education was based on Idealism. He believed in introducing play as a means of engaging children in self-activity for the purpose of externalizing their inner natures and a way of imitating and trying out various adult roles.. He believed that every human being had a spiritual essence and that every person had spiritual worth and dignity. ("spiritual mechanism) Like Idealists, he also believed that every child had within him all he was to be at birth, and that the proper educational environment was to encourage the child to grow and develop in an optimal manner. His model rested on four basic ideas: free self expression, creativity, social participation, and motor expression.

He divided learning into gifts and occupations. A gift was an object given to a child to play with--such as a ball--which helped the child to understand the concepts of shape, dimension, size, and their relationships. The occupations were items such as paints and clay which the children could use to make what they wished. Through the occupations, children externalized the concepts existing within their minds.


Johann Friedrich Herbart
1776-1841

Herbart's system of philosophy stems from the analysis of experience. The system includes logic, metaphysics, and aesthetics as coordinate elements. He rejected all concepts of separate mental faculties, postulating instead that all mental phenomena result from interaction of elementary ideas. Herbart believed that educational methods and systems should be based on psychology and ethics: psychology to furnish necessary knowledge of the mind and ethics to be used as a basis for determining the social ends of education. Learning follows from building up sequences of ideas important to the individual.


Robert Owen
1771-1849
Utopianism

With the realization of children working in mills, Owen campaigned for a “new moral world” society based on communities of mutual cooperation and equality. Generalizations should be made clear to students. Students should understand what they read. He believed education should create societal change.


Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi
1746 - 1827

Instead of dealing with words, he argued, children should learn through activity and through things. They should be free to pursue their own interests and draw their own conclusions (Darling 1994: 18). 

“I wish to wrest education from the outworn order of doddering old teaching hacks as well as from the new-fangled order of cheap, artificial teaching tricks, and entrust it to the eternal powers of nature herself, to the light which God has kindled and kept alive in the hearts of fathers and mothers, to the interests of parents who desire their children grow up in favour with God and with men.” (Pestalozzi quoted in Silber 1965: 134)

He placed a special emphasis on spontaneity and self-activity. Children should not be given ready-made answers but should arrive at answers themselves. To do this their own powers of seeing, judging and reasoning should be cultivated, their self-activity encouraged The aim is to educate the whole child - intellectual education is only part of a wider plan. He looked to balance, or keep in equilibrium, three elements - hands, heart and head.

Pestalozzi believed that thought began with sensation and that teaching should use the senses. Holding that children should study the objects in their natural environment, Pestalozzi developed a so-called "object lesson" that involved exercises in learning form, number, and language. Pupils determined and traced an object's form, counted objects, and named them. Students progressed from these lessons to exercises in drawing, writing, adding, subtracting, multiplying, dividing, and reading


 .http://www.infed.org/thinkers/et-pest.htm
http://www.applestar.org/capella/Educational%20Philosophers.pdf